This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Boyle, D. I.R. Articles by Cunningham, S. G. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Boyle, D. I.R. Articles by Cunningham, S. G. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Resolving fundamental quality issues in linked datasets for clinical care

University of Dundee, Medicines Monitoring Unit, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK Tel: +44 (0)1382 660111 Fax: +44 (0)1382 642637 douglas{at}memo.dundee.ac.uk

S. G. Cunningham

University of Dundee, Medicines Monitoring Unit, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK Tel: +44 (0)1382 660111 Fax: +44 (0)1382 642637 scottc{at}memo.dundee.ac.uk

The objective of this study was to resolve the problem whereby data entry error rates are compounded within a comprehensive Electronic Health Record (EHR). This is a prerequisite if quality issues are to be addressed through electronic record linkage as a step towards integrating personal health data. In our hospital, electronic record linkage of records included data collected through systematic validation of primary care notes and all other regional diabetes-specific data sources. Using manual validation (the systematic collection of data from paper records) as a gold standard, data error rates from individual clinical sources were calculated. An automated system was designed for managing the results of these comparisons allowing the practical ‘weighting’ of data from disparate sources and hence the summarization of a patient record accordingly. By applying ‘weighting’ to the patient data, a single summary for each patient was generated. Thirty-two per cent of patients had ambiguities (potential errors) for type of diabetes alone and these were fed back to their clinical sources. In almost all cases, the clinic database was found to be in error and could be subsequently corrected. This method has proven itself through the feedback of numerous data entry errors to clinic databases. Systems that include such an enterprise-wide negative feedback loop can actually improve data quality in clinical systems and hence reduce the risk of inappropriate treatment.

Key Words: Data quality • electronic record linkage • EHR • managed clinical networks • HEALTH21 • diabetes

Health Informatics Journal, Vol. 8, No. 2, 73-77 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/146045820200800205


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Orfanidis, P. D. Bamidis, and B. Eaglestone Data Quality Issues in Electronic Health Records: An Adaptation Framework for the Greek Health System Health Informatics Journal, March 1, 2004; 10(1): 23 - 36. [Abstract] [PDF]